A dual credential broker associate and state certified real estate appraiser serving Northern New Jersey. Published anonymously at the client's request; every figure below is unedited.
All of them begin around July 15: the visible inflection point when the content system launched. Rechecked August 8: the 3-month total still stands at 26, with no new sampled citations after July 26. Flat stretches get reported too.
Microsoft's topic: Home Appraisal & Valuation. In plain terms: the site was one of the sources AI cited in roughly 3 of every 10 sampled answers for that query.
The AI Performance overview: 26 total Copilot citations in Microsoft's 3-month window, with the activity starting mid-July, right after the first content published.
Captured August 8, 2026 · Bing Webmaster Tools · Microsoft-sampled data
The grounding query itself: "accurate Hoboken home valuation," filed by Microsoft under Home Appraisal & Valuation, with a 30.95% citation share on the sampled answers.
Captured August 8, 2026 · Bing Webmaster Tools · Microsoft-sampled dataFirst posts went live in early July. First citations were logged July 14. First observed, not caused: we log what the engines do and we date every log entry. Faster than we tell clients to expect. Our own guidance says citations typically follow 4 to 8 weeks of held rankings, and we stand by that. This one moved early.
We run the same 12 queries every month. Under our strict definition (cited means the domain appears in the AI answer's own sources; named means named in the answer text without a link), July's baseline reads: ChatGPT 0 of 12, Perplexity 1 cited, Google AI 1 named.
Methodology note, August 2026: we tightened the definition of a citation to in-answer sources only and restated July under the same rule. One July entry turned out to be organic placement near an AI answer, not a citation inside it, and it no longer counts. We would rather restate a month than inflate one. The full standard is published at how we measure AI visibility.
| Engine | July (restated) | August |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 0 of 12 | Named first on 2 of 12: both dual credential queries |
| Perplexity | Cited on 1 of 12 | 0 of 12 visible; the recheck found the site still in the source list, below the fold |
| Google AI | Named on 1 of 12 | 0 of 12 |
ChatGPT now names the client first on both dual credential queries: "real estate appraiser who also sells homes in New Jersey" and "NJ real estate agent who is a certified appraiser". The appraiser-broker moat, answered by name.
Perplexity's July citation on the Hoboken condo report slipped below the visible fold: the August 8 recheck found the site still in the source list at position 6, outranked by fresher-dated monthly reports. A demotion, not a disappearance, and the fix is freshness. And Google AI now answers the appraiser query with a general explainer that names no individuals at all.
Since August 5 we also sample ChatGPT by API, three samples per query, every day. The same questions, asked repeatedly, tell a deeper story than one screenshot:
One screenshot says visible or invisible. Frequency says how often. This is the reason the panel runs repeatedly instead of trusting any single answer.
"Hoboken condo market 2026": the report moved from organic position 4 in July to position 1 in August, with the client's statistics quoted in the result snippet.
Brand-new domain. Zero search history. First content published early July 2026, with six data-backed articles live as of late July. In the early weeks, only about 7 distinct queries were even visible in Google Search Console. That is the "before" picture, and it is what makes a 12 day citation timeline the story.
Fully indexed and served by Bing, ranking first for the client's own name and brand.
The neighborhood guide with an interactive map outranks the portals for the query it was built for. The guide plus map format works.
A verified market data pipeline with a fact checker that has refused drafts containing wrong numbers. Self-updating county data pages. A dynamic llms.txt. Speakable schema. IndexNow pings on every publish. This infrastructure is the service: every Filtrs client runs on the same machine.
The client asked to stay anonymous, so the name and domain are redacted here and inside the screenshots. Nothing else is altered: the queries, counts, dates, sources, and losses are exactly as recorded. Our measurement standard explains how every figure on this page was collected.
This demonstrates that the client became more visible and citable to AI search systems. It does not yet prove the visibility produced a client.
AI answers are volatile. Every result on this page is logged with its query, date, platform, and screenshot, and is reported as observed, not as a permanent ranking.
And for balance: August recorded losses alongside gains. Perplexity, which cited the site in July, kept it only below the fold in August. Google AI now answers the appraiser question with a general explainer that names no one. Losses are published here with the same prominence as wins. That is how the rest of this page stays believable.